Salerno v Northern Beaches Council [2020] NSWLEC 1376
Because the parties reached and filed an agreement under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied on the material that the proposed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions and that there was no jurisdictional impediment, the proceedings had to be disposed of in accordance with that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of a Development Application / Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application DA 2019/0954 approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'alterations and Additions to Existing Dwelling' 'secondary Dwelling' 'swimming Pool' 'conciliation Agreement' 'development Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of a Development Application / Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders in accordance with the parties' s 34 agreement in the proper exercise of its functions." 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for granting consent to Development Application DA 2019/0954 were satisfied.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached and filed an agreement under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied on the material that the proposed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions and that there was no jurisdictional impediment, the proceedings had to be disposed of in accordance with that agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application DA 2019/0954 approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely on the amended plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure A.' "The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the agreed sum of $2,000.00."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment