R v N.K.S. [2004] NSWCCA 144
The evidence of Ms Anglais was admissible as probative corroboration of the complainant's account and its exclusion was erroneous; concerns about prejudice could be remedied by judicial direction and did not justify exclusion under s 137 Evidence Act 1995.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Crown Appeal Under S 5 F(3 A) of Criminal Appeal Act 1912 / Interlocutory Appeal During Jury Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; evidence ruled admissible; certificate as to costs granted to respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence' 'crown Appeal During Trial' 'corroboration' 'exclusion of Evidence Under S 137' 'proceedings Under Criminal Appeal Act S 5 F(3 A)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Crown Appeal Under S 5 F(3 A) of Criminal Appeal Act 1912 / Interlocutory Appeal During Jury Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in rejecting evidence of psychologist Helen Anglais under s 137 of the Evidence Act 1995' 'Whether the proposed evidence should be excluded as unfairly prejudicial' 'Whether a Crown appeal against exclusion of evidence was appropriate under the new s 5F(3A)']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of Ms Anglais was admissible as probative corroboration of the complainant's account and its exclusion was erroneous; concerns about prejudice could be remedied by judicial direction and did not justify exclusion under s 137 Evidence Act 1995.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; evidence ruled admissible; certificate as to costs granted to respondent.
Orders
- ['Orders rejecting evidence of Miss Anglais relating to 29 October and 3 December 1985 vacated.' 'Stay of trial lifted to enable resumption.' 'Certificate under Suitors Fund Act 1951 granted to respondent for appeal costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment