NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Limited [2010] NSWSC 945
The Court held that, in the circumstances, Mr Combellack's 2005 expert report should be admitted notwithstanding concerns about compliance with the Expert Code of Conduct, due to the expert's oral evidence, earlier exchanges of the reports, absence of procedural prejudice, and the utility of the opinions expressed. Individual objections to portions of the report would be ruled on separately.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural Ruling in Civil Proceedings / Evidentiary Ruling During Hearing
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's expert report admitted into evidence, subject to separate rulings on individual objections.
- Legal Topics
- ['expert Evidence' 'admissibility' 'expert Code of Conduct']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Procedural Ruling in Civil Proceedings / Evidentiary Ruling During Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff's expert report prepared in 2005 and based on a 2001 report complies with the Expert Code of Conduct and should be admitted into evidence" 'Whether prejudicial or inadequate reasoning in the report warrants exclusion']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that, in the circumstances, Mr Combellack's 2005 expert report should be admitted notwithstanding concerns about compliance with the Expert Code of Conduct, due to the expert's oral evidence, earlier exchanges of the reports, absence of procedural prejudice, and the utility of the opinions expressed. Individual objections to portions of the report would be ruled on separately.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's expert report admitted into evidence, subject to separate rulings on individual objections.
Orders
- ["Mr Combellack's undated report prepared in 2005 is admitted subject to my individual rulings that have otherwise been separately notified."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment