NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Limited [2010] NSWSC 945

NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Limited [2010] NSWSC 945

The Court held that, in the circumstances, Mr Combellack's 2005 expert report should be admitted notwithstanding concerns about compliance with the Expert Code of Conduct, due to the expert's oral evidence, earlier exchanges of the reports, absence of procedural prejudice, and the utility of the opinions expressed. Individual objections to portions of the report would be ruled on separately.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 August 2010
Procedural Posture
Procedural Ruling in Civil Proceedings / Evidentiary Ruling During Hearing
Outcome
Plaintiff's expert report admitted into evidence, subject to separate rulings on individual objections.
Legal Topics
['expert Evidence' 'admissibility' 'expert Code of Conduct']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Procedural Ruling in Civil Proceedings / Evidentiary Ruling During Hearing

  1. 1 ["Whether the plaintiff's expert report prepared in 2005 and based on a 2001 report complies with the Expert Code of Conduct and should be admitted into evidence" 'Whether prejudicial or inadequate reasoning in the report warrants exclusion']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that, in the circumstances, Mr Combellack's 2005 expert report should be admitted notwithstanding concerns about compliance with the Expert Code of Conduct, due to the expert's oral evidence, earlier exchanges of the reports, absence of procedural prejudice, and the utility of the opinions expressed. Individual objections to portions of the report would be ruled on separately.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's expert report admitted into evidence, subject to separate rulings on individual objections.

Orders

  • ["Mr Combellack's undated report prepared in 2005 is admitted subject to my individual rulings that have otherwise been separately notified."]