SHORTEN v SHORTEN [2002] NSWCA 73

SHORTEN v SHORTEN [2002] NSWCA 73

The Court held that Foster AJ correctly applied the accepted principles of testamentary capacity to the facts. The trial judge was entitled to accept evidence that, despite serious communication and visual impairments caused by the stroke, the deceased retained relevant memory, could understand and communicate with patience, gave and confirmed rational instructions to an independent solicitor, and knew and approved of the simple 1996 will. The appellant showed no error in the treatment of the lay or medical evidence, the omission of Jocelyn, the solicitor's evidence, or the costs discretion. The appeal was therefore dismissed with costs, with further reasons reserved on an outstanding...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Probate Appeal Concerning Testamentary Capacity / Appeal From Supreme Court Equity Division Grant of Probate in Solemn Form
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; further reasons reserved on the outstanding costs issue.
Legal Topics
['testamentary Capacity' 'knowledge and Approval of Will' 'probate in Solemn Form' 'onus of Proof' 'costs on Appeal']
['succession Law' 'probate' 'civil Procedure'] ['testamentary Capacity' 'knowledge and Approval of Will' 'probate in Solemn Form' 'onus of Proof' 'costs on Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Probate Appeal Concerning Testamentary Capacity / Appeal From Supreme Court Equity Division Grant of Probate in Solemn Form

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Florence Minnie Shorten had testamentary capacity when she gave instructions for and executed her will of 25 January 1996.' "Whether the trial judge erred in accepting lay and medical evidence supporting testamentary capacity despite the deceased's stroke and communication impairments." "Whether the omission of the deceased's daughter from the 1996 will reflected adversely on testamentary capacity." 'Whether there was error in the costs order made below.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that Foster AJ correctly applied the accepted principles of testamentary capacity to the facts. The trial judge was entitled to accept evidence that, despite serious communication and visual impairments caused by the stroke, the deceased retained relevant memory, could understand and communicate with patience, gave and confirmed rational instructions to an independent solicitor, and knew and approved of the simple 1996 will. The appellant showed no error in the treatment of the lay or medical evidence, the omission of Jocelyn, the solicitor's evidence, or the costs discretion. The appeal was therefore dismissed with costs, with further reasons reserved on an outstanding...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; further reasons reserved on the outstanding costs issue.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed with costs.' 'The Court reserves its further reasons on the outstanding costs issue.']