SHORTEN v SHORTEN (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 60

SHORTEN v SHORTEN (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 60

The appeal as to costs failed because the trial judge correctly exercised his discretion within accepted principles, holding that although there were grounds reasonably to investigate testamentary capacity, this did not necessarily mean the testator caused the litigation; thus, the unsuccessful party bore his own costs as per the general rule with no sufficient ground for an exception.

Parties
Appellant: Noel William Shorten; Respondent: Stanley Alexander Shorten
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supplementary Judgment/reasons on Costs Following Dismissal of Appeal
Outcome
Supplementary reasons for earlier dismissal of appeal with costs.
Legal Topics
Contested Probate Proceedings, Costs, Testamentary Capacity, Exceptions to Costs Orders in Probate Litigation
Wills, Probate and Administration Contested Probate Proceedings Costs Testamentary Capacity Exceptions to Costs Orders in Probate Litigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 27 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Noel William Shorten

Appellant

Stanley Alexander Shorten

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supplementary Judgment/reasons on Costs Following Dismissal of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a party unsuccessfully opposing probate should have costs out of the estate
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's challenge to the costs order should succeed based on claimed exceptions in probate litigation

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal as to costs failed because the trial judge correctly exercised his discretion within accepted principles, holding that although there were grounds reasonably to investigate testamentary capacity, this did not necessarily mean the testator caused the litigation; thus, the unsuccessful party bore his own costs as per the general rule with no sufficient ground for an exception.

Court Disposition

Supplementary reasons for earlier dismissal of appeal with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal previously dismissed with costs; supplementary reasons provided.