Komis v Debrah [2021] NSWSC 1073

The proceedings were dismissed because the plaintiff sought possession but, when the Statement of Claim was filed on 7 December 2020, she had already vacated the premises and no longer had a right to possess any part of them; the defendants had also vacated, and any alleged debt was not a matter for the possession list.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 24 August 2021
Procedural Posture: Possession Proceedings Commenced by Statement of Claim / Procedural Ruling; Proceedings Dismissed
Outcome: Proceedings dismissed; each party to bear its own costs.
Legal Topics: ['possession of Premises' 'commercial Lease' 'commercial Tenancy Sub Lease' 'costs' 'misconceived Proceedings']

['property Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['possession of Premises' 'commercial Lease' 'commercial Tenancy Sub Lease' 'costs' 'misconceived Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Possession Proceedings Commenced by Statement of Claim / Procedural Ruling; Proceedings Dismissed

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the plaintiff could obtain an order for possession of the premises when, at the time the proceedings were filed, she no longer had a right to possess any of the premises.' 'Whether each party should bear its own costs where the proceedings failed and the defendants were self-represented.']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Proceedings dismissed; each party to bear its own costs.

Orders

['The proceedings are dismissed.' 'Each party is to bear its own costs of the proceedings.']