Nominal Defendant v Genn (No. 2) [2004] NSWCA 335
Although the offer was sufficient to engage the compromise rules and any defect in form was only technical, indemnity costs were not appropriate because the appeal had merit, the judgment below was deficient, the respondent's compromise was very small, and the respondent still required the appellant to pay the appeal costs; ordinary costs should therefore stand.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Costs Following Dismissal of Appeal
- Outcome
- Order as pronounced on 1 September 2004 stands, costs to be assessed on the ordinary basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['offer of Compromise' 'indemnity Costs' 'discretionary Costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Costs Following Dismissal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent's Offer of Compromise warranted costs on an indemnity or other special basis after the appeal was dismissed." 'Whether the Offer of Compromise involved a sufficient compromise and was in proper form.' 'Whether discretionary considerations justified refusing a special costs order.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the offer was sufficient to engage the compromise rules and any defect in form was only technical, indemnity costs were not appropriate because the appeal had merit, the judgment below was deficient, the respondent's compromise was very small, and the respondent still required the appellant to pay the appeal costs; ordinary costs should therefore stand.
Court Disposition
Order as pronounced on 1 September 2004 stands, costs to be assessed on the ordinary basis.
Orders
- ['The order as pronounced on 1 September 2004 stands.' 'The costs are to be assessed on the ordinary basis.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment