Polycarpou v Mao [2021] NSWLEC 1187
The Court found on the balance of probabilities that the respondents' tree caused damage to the applicant's property and that, despite the tree's removal, it was appropriate to order rectification of the damaged sections of wall and path. The respondents are ordered to pay for rectifying the wall and half the cost of rectifying the path, considering both parties' actions and insurance coverage.
- Parties
- Applicant: Nonie Polycarpou; First Respondent: Liying Mao; Second Respondent: Nan Shao
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application (class 2) / Final Orders
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Damage to Property by Trees, Rectification of Property Damage, Neighbour Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nonie Polycarpou
Applicant
Liying Mao
First Respondent
Nan Shao
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application (class 2) / Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents' tree caused damage to the applicant's property
- 2 Whether rectification orders should be made after the removal of the tree
- 3 Whether and to what extent the respondents should pay rectification costs
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found on the balance of probabilities that the respondents' tree caused damage to the applicant's property and that, despite the tree's removal, it was appropriate to order rectification of the damaged sections of wall and path. The respondents are ordered to pay for rectifying the wall and half the cost of rectifying the path, considering both parties' actions and insurance coverage.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- The applicant is to engage a suitably experienced contractor to replace the approximately 3-metre front section of her original concrete path within 6 months.
- The applicant is to provide respondents with a receipted paid invoice within 14 days of works' completion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment