Olbourne v Excell Building Corp Pty Limited [2009] NSWSC 349
Despite the unusual arrangements, an 'arrangement' within s 4 existed between Dr Olbourne and Excell, as Dr Olbourne assumed control, directed payments, and undertook to fund the project, creating mutual rights and obligations. This constituted a construction contract for purposes of the Act; s 7(3)(c) did not exclude it, and evidence of a denial of natural justice was not established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings (technology & Construction List) / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['building Contracts' 'security of Payment' 'adjudication Review' 'arrangements Under Construction Contracts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings (technology & Construction List) / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether there existed a 'construction contract' or 'arrangement' within s 4 of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 between plaintiff and first defendant" 'Whether any contract or arrangement was excluded by s 7(3)(c) of the Act' 'Whether the adjudicator failed to accord natural justice']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the unusual arrangements, an 'arrangement' within s 4 existed between Dr Olbourne and Excell, as Dr Olbourne assumed control, directed payments, and undertook to fund the project, creating mutual rights and obligations. This constituted a construction contract for purposes of the Act; s 7(3)(c) did not exclude it, and evidence of a denial of natural justice was not established.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment