Bow v Blacktown City Council [2008] NSWLEC 211
Compensation for compulsorily acquired land is to be determined with reference to the market value disregarding the public purpose zoning, with appropriate adjustments reflecting real risks of environmental requirements and physical constraints as evidenced by comparable sales, but not to the extent of speculative or excessive discounts; in this case, compensation is to be assessed at $3,395,628.70, calculated on a developable area and riparian corridor at rates supported by the most reliable comparable sale (lot 31), with a modest deduction for species impact risk and associated development risks.
- Parties
- Applicant: Norman Bow; Respondent: Blacktown City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Claim (compulsory Acquisition of Land) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Applicant awarded compensation
- Legal Topics
- Market Value, Compensatory Offsets, Threatened Species, Comparable Sales, Zoning, Development Constraints
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Norman Bow
Applicant
Blacktown City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Compensation Claim (compulsory Acquisition of Land) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate amount of compensation for compulsorily acquired land under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991?
- 2 What effect does the presence of an endangered ecological community (Cumberland Plain Woodland) and a creek have on the market value of the land?
- 3 How should comparable sales be evaluated for land with environmental and development constraints?
Ratio Decidendi
Compensation for compulsorily acquired land is to be determined with reference to the market value disregarding the public purpose zoning, with appropriate adjustments reflecting real risks of environmental requirements and physical constraints as evidenced by comparable sales, but not to the extent of speculative or excessive discounts; in this case, compensation is to be assessed at $3,395,628.70, calculated on a developable area and riparian corridor at rates supported by the most reliable comparable sale (lot 31), with a modest deduction for species impact risk and associated development risks.
Court Disposition
Applicant awarded compensation
Orders
- Mr Bow's claim for compensation is determined in the amount of $3,395,628.70.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment