Carter v Capito & anor [2017] NSWLEC 1740
The cypress hedge constitutes a severe obstruction of view under s 14E(2) of the Trees Act. Annual pruning to 3.0 metres will restore the applicant's view while maintaining most of respondents' privacy, and such pruning should be carried out by a suitably qualified arborist in accordance with safety codes.
- Parties
- Applicant: Norman Carter; First Respondent: Alfonso Capito; Second Respondent: Maria Capito
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Application / Final Decision and Orders
- Outcome
- Application upheld
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes, Obstruction of Views, Privacy Balancing, Annual Pruning Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Norman Carter
Applicant
Alfonso Capito
First Respondent
Maria Capito
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Application / Final Decision and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cypress hedge severely obstructs views from the applicant's dwelling
- 2 What pruning orders should be made to balance restoration of views and maintenance of respondents' privacy
Ratio Decidendi
The cypress hedge constitutes a severe obstruction of view under s 14E(2) of the Trees Act. Annual pruning to 3.0 metres will restore the applicant's view while maintaining most of respondents' privacy, and such pruning should be carried out by a suitably qualified arborist in accordance with safety codes.
Court Disposition
Application upheld
Orders
- Within 60 days, and then annually in November starting November 2018, respondents to engage a qualified arborist (AQF level 3 minimum) with insurance to prune each tree in the hedge to a height no greater than 3.0 metres above its base and remove debris from applicant's property.
- Works to be carried out in accordance with the WorkCover NSW Code of Practice for the Amenity Tree Industry or equivalent safety standard.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment