HERDEGEN -v- WOOLWORTHS LTD [1997] IRCA 86
The Court found that the applicant grabbed Miss Booth by the ponytail, threatened to put or slam her head through the wall, and pushed her head into the wall. Given his position as Assistant Manager and Acting Manager, the power imbalance, and the nature of the assault and threat against a young female junior...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application Alleging Unlawful Termination of Employment / Final Hearing; Reasons for Decision and Orders
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['termination of Employment' 'valid Reason' 'serious Misconduct' 'summary Termination' 'opportunity to Respond to Allegations' 'procedural Fairness']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Alleging Unlawful Termination of Employment / Final Hearing; Reasons for Decision and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's conduct in the systems room on 26 July 1996 occurred as alleged, including whether he grabbed Miss Booth by the ponytail, threatened her, and pushed her head into the wall." 'Whether that conduct was serious misconduct warranting summary termination of employment.' 'Whether there was a valid reason for termination under section 170DE(1) of the Workplace Relations Act, 1996.' 'Whether the respondent breached section 170DC of the Workplace Relations Act, 1996 by not giving the applicant an opportunity to argue that his employment should not be terminated.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicant grabbed Miss Booth by the ponytail, threatened to put or slam her head through the wall, and pushed her head into the wall. Given his position as Assistant Manager and Acting Manager, the power imbalance, and the nature of the assault and threat against a young female junior employee, the conduct was serious misconduct and a valid reason for termination under section 170DE(1). Even if the applicant was not given an opportunity to argue that his employment should not be terminated, section 170DC was not breached because the seriousness of the misconduct meant there was no reasonable alternative to termination and it would have been futile and unreasonable...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment