Cincotta v Jones [2002] FCA 937

Cincotta v Jones [2002] FCA 937

The Court accepted that, on the untested evidence before it, the applicant had done as much as he reasonably could to have the matter dealt with, and the evidence did not compel disbelief. The filing of the statement of affairs was a proceeding under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) within s 306; although it was irregular that the statement was not filed with the Court as the Act then required, the irregularity appeared to have been caused by the document going astray in the trustee's office and no substantial injustice was caused. The statement was therefore deemed duly filed no later than 30 August 1995, resulting in discharge from bankruptcy on 1 September 1998.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 July 2002
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Reasons for Judgment and Orders
Outcome
Application granted; statement of affairs deemed duly filed and applicant declared discharged from bankruptcy; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
['statement of Affairs' 'discharge From Bankruptcy' 'irregularity in Filing' 's 306']
['bankruptcy' 'federal Court Procedure'] ['statement of Affairs' 'discharge From Bankruptcy' 'irregularity in Filing' 's 306']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Application / Reasons for Judgment and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant delivered a statement of affairs to the Office of the Trustee in July or August 1995 following a sequestration order.' 'Whether the statement of affairs should be deemed to have been duly filed under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).' 'Whether any irregularity in filing caused substantial injustice.' 'Whether the applicant was discharged from bankruptcy on 1 September 1998.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court accepted that, on the untested evidence before it, the applicant had done as much as he reasonably could to have the matter dealt with, and the evidence did not compel disbelief. The filing of the statement of affairs was a proceeding under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) within s 306; although it was irregular that the statement was not filed with the Court as the Act then required, the irregularity appeared to have been caused by the document going astray in the trustee's office and no substantial injustice was caused. The statement was therefore deemed duly filed no later than 30 August 1995, resulting in discharge from bankruptcy on 1 September 1998.

Court Disposition

Application granted; statement of affairs deemed duly filed and applicant declared discharged from bankruptcy; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • ["The applicant's statement of affairs be deemed to have been duly filed in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) no later than 30 August 1995." 'The applicant was discharged from bankruptcy on 1 September 1998.' 'No order as to costs.']