Estate of Jack Alexander Warren [2001] NSWSC 104

Estate of Jack Alexander Warren [2001] NSWSC 104

The bequest to 'children' in Jack Alexander Warren's will includes his step-child Norman Keith Warren, who was treated as a child and part of the family unit, but does not include his step-child George John Griffith/Warren, who was not part of the family unit after childhood.

Parties
Plaintiff: Norman Keith Warren; Plaintiff: Keith Thompson
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 February 2001
Procedural Posture
Probate / Judgment
Outcome
Declaration granted; costs ordered to be paid out of the estate.
Legal Topics
Interpretation of 'children' in Wills, Residuary Bequests, Inclusion of Step Children
Wills and Estates Interpretation of 'children' in Wills Residuary Bequests Inclusion of Step Children

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Norman Keith Warren

Plaintiff

Keith Thompson

Plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Probate / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the term 'children' in the deceased's will includes step-children
  2. 2 Construction of the residuary bequest in favour of 'children'

Ratio Decidendi

The bequest to 'children' in Jack Alexander Warren's will includes his step-child Norman Keith Warren, who was treated as a child and part of the family unit, but does not include his step-child George John Griffith/Warren, who was not part of the family unit after childhood.

Court Disposition

Declaration granted; costs ordered to be paid out of the estate.

Orders

  • Declare that the residuary bequest to 'children' includes Norman Keith Warren but not George John Griffith/Warren.
  • Order that the costs of the proceedings be paid out of the estate.