Turney v Galloway [2000] NSWCA 265
There was no error by the trial judge in refusing to allow the appellant to reopen the plea of contributory negligence or to adjourn the trial, nor in the assessment of damages (except correction of arithmetical error), as the decisions and awards were within the judge’s discretion and grounded in the evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs. Damages awarded to the respondent reduced to correct arithmetical error.
- Legal Topics
- ['negligence' 'contributory Negligence' 'damages' 'motor Vehicle Accident']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in refusing an adjournment application to plead contributory negligence' 'Whether damages awarded were correct and not excessive' 'Whether non-economic loss percentage was appropriate' 'Whether specific heads of damage (economic loss, superannuation benefits, viscosupplementation, knee replacement, pain management) were properly assessed']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error by the trial judge in refusing to allow the appellant to reopen the plea of contributory negligence or to adjourn the trial, nor in the assessment of damages (except correction of arithmetical error), as the decisions and awards were within the judge’s discretion and grounded in the evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs. Damages awarded to the respondent reduced to correct arithmetical error.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.' "The amount of the respondent's damages reduced from $301,606.17 to $299,928.47."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment