Wright v Woollahra Municipal Council [2009] NSWLEC 1173
The proposed modification, with a reduction in maximum height to RL 10.30 (below the maximum permitted), results in only minor additional view loss from neighbouring apartments, maintains satisfactory view sharing in accordance with planning objectives and the Tenacity principles, and complies with all relevant planning controls. Therefore, the modification should be approved.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Modification Application Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld; modification application approved
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'building Height' 'view Loss' 'view Sharing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Modification Application Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed modification to increase building height should be granted having regard to impacts on view loss from neighbouring properties and compliance with relevant planning controls.']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed modification, with a reduction in maximum height to RL 10.30 (below the maximum permitted), results in only minor additional view loss from neighbouring apartments, maintains satisfactory view sharing in accordance with planning objectives and the Tenacity principles, and complies with all relevant planning controls. Therefore, the modification should be approved.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld; modification application approved
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The modification application to amend development consent 673/2006/1 (6 November 2007) for alterations and additions/construction of a dwelling house at 2 Marine Parade Double Bay is approved and the consent is modified as specified.' 'Work must proceed in accordance with the amended plans...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment