NORTH SOUTH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P/L v CONSTRUCTION PACIFIC MANAGEMENT P/L [2002] NSWSC 286
Because Mr Bianco, a director and principal of the plaintiff company, actively participated in the litigation and produced in evidence bogus documents constituting an abuse of process, and as the plaintiff was unlikely to satisfy a costs order, an order for costs against Mr Bianco as a non-party is within the court's power and justified on discretionary grounds.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: North South Construction Services Pty Ltd; Defendant: Construction Pacific Management Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment; Costs Application
- Outcome
- Order for costs against non-party director granted
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Abuse of Process, Non Party Costs Order, Limited Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North South Construction Services Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Construction Pacific Management Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment; Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has power to order costs against non-party director under SCR Pt 52A r4(2) and (5)(d)
- 2 Whether Mr Bianco committed an abuse of process by presenting bogus documents in evidence
- 3 Whether the costs claimed were occasioned by the abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
Because Mr Bianco, a director and principal of the plaintiff company, actively participated in the litigation and produced in evidence bogus documents constituting an abuse of process, and as the plaintiff was unlikely to satisfy a costs order, an order for costs against Mr Bianco as a non-party is within the court's power and justified on discretionary grounds.
Court Disposition
Order for costs against non-party director granted
Orders
- Serafino Bianco (Phil Bianco) to pay to the defendant the costs of the defendant of the proceedings upon the plaintiff's summons.
- Serafino Bianco to pay to the defendant the costs of the application of 5 April 2002 for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment