North Sydney Council v O'Hara [2001] NSWLEC 286
Having regard to the history of the matter and the positions of both parties, the Court accepted that Ms O'Hara genuinely believed she could complete the works by 15 February 2002, but considered that any further extension should be made in a final self-executing manner. Orders 7, 10 and 11 made on 18 July 2001 were therefore varied by replacing the relevant dates with 15 February 2002 and 30 March 2002.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Injunctions and Declarations / Notice of Motion for Variation of Final Orders
- Outcome
- Orders 7, 10 and 11 made on 18 July 2001 varied; costs on the notice of motion reserved; otherwise outstanding notices of motion dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['variation of Final Orders' 'injunctions and Declarations' 'completion of Works' 'costs Reserved']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Injunctions and Declarations / Notice of Motion for Variation of Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether orders 7, 10 and 11 made on 18 July 2001 should be varied to extend the dates for completion of works and related steps.' 'Whether the matter should be dealt with in a final self-executing manner.' 'What should happen to outstanding notices of motion and subpoenas.']
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to the history of the matter and the positions of both parties, the Court accepted that Ms O'Hara genuinely believed she could complete the works by 15 February 2002, but considered that any further extension should be made in a final self-executing manner. Orders 7, 10 and 11 made on 18 July 2001 were therefore varied by replacing the relevant dates with 15 February 2002 and 30 March 2002.
Court Disposition
Orders 7, 10 and 11 made on 18 July 2001 varied; costs on the notice of motion reserved; otherwise outstanding notices of motion dismissed.
Orders
- ['The dates of 11 October 2001 in order 7 and 25 October 2001 in order 10 are varied to 15 February 2002.' 'The date in order 11 is varied to 30 March 2002.' 'Costs on this notice of motion are reserved.' 'Otherwise the outstanding notices of motion are dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment