MacPherson v Northern Beaches Council [2022] NSWLEC 1424
The Court granted consent to the amended development application, satisfied by the written request for a variation under cl 4.6 of MLEP and agreement between parties that all jurisdictional preconditions, including consideration of environmental factors, contamination, biodiversity, scenic protection, and consistency with planning objectives, are met.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Alexander MacPherson; Second Applicant: Kate Mansour; Respondent: Northern Beaches Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; costs order made
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Variation to Development Standards, Conciliation Conference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander MacPherson
First Applicant
Kate Mansour
Second Applicant
Northern Beaches Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development consent should be granted for alterations and additions to a semi-detached dwelling at 111 Bower Street, Manly
- 2 Whether breach of the height development standard under Manly Local Environmental Plan 2013 is justified
- 3 Whether jurisdictional preconditions for consent are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted consent to the amended development application, satisfied by the written request for a variation under cl 4.6 of MLEP and agreement between parties that all jurisdictional preconditions, including consideration of environmental factors, contamination, biodiversity, scenic protection, and consistency with planning objectives, are met.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; costs order made
Orders
- The updated written request pursuant to clause 4.6 of Manly Local Environmental Plan 2013 (MLEP), seeking a variation to the minimum lot size development standard in cl 4.3 of MLEP, is upheld.
- The Appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment