McGhee v Northern Beaches Council [2023] NSWLEC 1405
The Court was satisfied that the proposed development would gain a view from the site and therefore the Tenacity assessment applied. Although the proposal would take away some of the view from 20 Headland Road and the loss was severe for the affected portion of the southern panoramic view, the assessment had to consider the whole property, which would continue to enjoy significant views including retained views of St Patrick's Estate. The proposal was numerically compliant apart from a slight DCP building envelope exceedance that did not itself affect view loss, and the Applicant had made skilful design changes to reduce the view impact while maintaining development potential and amenity....
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application Da2021/1734; Conciliation Conference Terminated and Hearing Proceeded to Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions in Annexure A; exhibits retained.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Refusal Appeal' 'demolition and Construction of Dwelling House' 'reasonable View Sharing' 'tenacity Planning Principle' 'warringah Development Control Plan Controls' 'conditions of Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application Da2021/1734; Conciliation Conference Terminated and Hearing Proceeded to Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development would result in reasonable view sharing between 21 Headland Road, North Curl Curl and 20 Headland Road, North Curl Curl in accordance with Tenacity Consulting v Warringah Council (2004) 134 LGERA 23; [2004] NSWLEC 140.' 'Whether the proposed development would obtain a view from the site such that view sharing principles could be applied.' 'Whether the extent of impact on views from 20 Headland Road was acceptable when assessed from the whole of the property.' 'Whether the proposal causing the view impact was reasonable, including whether a more skilful design could provide the same development potential and amenity with reduced view impact.' "Whether the respondent's proposed additional wording for landscape condition 22 should be included."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the proposed development would gain a view from the site and therefore the Tenacity assessment applied. Although the proposal would take away some of the view from 20 Headland Road and the loss was severe for the affected portion of the southern panoramic view, the assessment had to consider the whole property, which would continue to enjoy significant views including retained views of St Patrick's Estate. The proposal was numerically compliant apart from a slight DCP building envelope exceedance that did not itself affect view loss, and the Applicant had made skilful design changes to reduce the view impact while maintaining development potential and amenity....
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions in Annexure A; exhibits retained.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development application No DA2021/1734 for demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a dwelling house and associated landscaping works at 21 Headland Road, Curl Curl legally described as Lot 107 in DP6143 is determined by granting consent to the application subject to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment