North v Marra Developments Ltd [1981] HCA 68
The underlying agreement between the appellants and Marra Developments Ltd. was illegal, as its performance contravened s. 70 of the Securities Industry Act 1970 (NSW) by artificially supporting the market price of Marra shares for the purposes of a takeover scheme, creating a misleading appearance of the market price; the appellants' conduct also involved fraudulent and misleading statements, invalidating their claim under both statute and common law. Recovery for remuneration is barred where performance involves illegality.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['illegality of Contract' 'market Manipulation' 'fraudulent Conduct' 'breach of Statutory Provisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the agreement for remuneration was illegal under s. 70 of the Securities Industry Act 1970 (NSW)' "Whether the appellants' conduct constituted common law fraud and/or statutory contravention" 'Whether remuneration can be recovered when the contract performance involved illegality']
Ratio Decidendi
The underlying agreement between the appellants and Marra Developments Ltd. was illegal, as its performance contravened s. 70 of the Securities Industry Act 1970 (NSW) by artificially supporting the market price of Marra shares for the purposes of a takeover scheme, creating a misleading appearance of the market price; the appellants' conduct also involved fraudulent and misleading statements, invalidating their claim under both statute and common law. Recovery for remuneration is barred where performance involves illegality.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment