Re: "M" [2002] NSWSC 158
Although not all requirements of the Status of Children Regulation 1998 were met, particularly regarding the sampler named in Registrar's notice, the court was satisfied by other evidence, especially the affidavit of the laboratory manager, to make a declaration of paternity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Declaration of Paternity / Judgment on Renewed Application After Initial Refusal
- Outcome
- Declaration of paternity made
- Legal Topics
- ['paternity' 'parentage Testing Procedures' 'dna Evidence' 'status of Children Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaration of Paternity / Judgment on Renewed Application After Initial Refusal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sufficient evidence exists for a declaration of paternity' 'Whether procedural requirements for parentage testing under the Status of Children Act 1996 and Regulation 1998 were satisfied' "Court's discretion to make a declaration where evidence diverges from strict procedural regime"]
Ratio Decidendi
Although not all requirements of the Status of Children Regulation 1998 were met, particularly regarding the sampler named in Registrar's notice, the court was satisfied by other evidence, especially the affidavit of the laboratory manager, to make a declaration of paternity.
Court Disposition
Declaration of paternity made
Orders
- ['Declaration of paternity made in accordance with draft order' "Non-disclosure order: name of child and father not to be disclosed except to parties, Registrar of Births Deaths and Marriages, Children's Court, and legal representatives" 'Publication of reasons for judgment authorised, but no other document']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment