An Adoptive Father v Minister for Family and Community Services [2019] NSWSC 878
The documents sought in the notice to produce do not bear upon any remaining issue in the appeal, given the first foster carer is no longer caring for the children, and the defendants will not propound the first carer for future care; therefore, access to the documents is denied for lack of legitimate forensic purpose.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Notice to Produce
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application for access to the documents under notice to produce is denied.
- Legal Topics
- ['notice to Produce' 'subpoena' 'legitimate Forensic Purpose' 'permanency Planning' 'care Arrangements Under Care Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Notice to Produce
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether plaintiff should be given access to documents produced in accordance with the notice to produce' 'Whether the notice to produce demonstrates a legitimate forensic purpose']
Ratio Decidendi
The documents sought in the notice to produce do not bear upon any remaining issue in the appeal, given the first foster carer is no longer caring for the children, and the defendants will not propound the first carer for future care; therefore, access to the documents is denied for lack of legitimate forensic purpose.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application for access to the documents under notice to produce is denied.
Orders
- ["Set aside the plaintiff's notice to produce documents dated 20 March 2019." 'List the question of disposition of costs together with the hearing of these proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment