Kingsman v Health Administration Corporation [2000] NSWCA 163

The notice of appeal did not state any proper grounds for appeal, and its maintenance would constitute an abuse of the process of the Court; accordingly, it should be struck out.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 03 July 2000
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome: Notice of appeal struck out. Opponent to pay claimant's costs.
Legal Topics: ['notice of Appeal' 'abuse of Process' 'inherent Power to Strike Out']

['civil Procedure'] ['notice of Appeal' 'abuse of Process' 'inherent Power to Strike Out']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the notice of appeal identified a proper basis for appeal' 'Whether the notice of appeal constituted an abuse of process']

Ratio Decidendi

The notice of appeal did not state any proper grounds for appeal, and its maintenance would constitute an abuse of the process of the Court; accordingly, it should be struck out.

Court Disposition

Notice of appeal struck out. Opponent to pay claimant's costs.

Orders

['Notice of appeal struck out.' "Opponent to pay claimant's costs."]