Petrotimor Companhia de Petroleos S.A.R.L. v Commonwealth of Australia [2002] FCA 18
Production of documents under the notice to produce is deferred, as requiring immediate compliance would not serve a legitimate forensic purpose at this interlocutory stage, where the strike out application is pending and the necessity for production has not been demonstrated. The court reserves liberty to apply or restore the notice if circumstances change.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Petrotimor Companhia de Petroleos S.A.R.L.; Second Applicant: Oceanic Exploration Company; First Respondent: Commonwealth of Australia; Second Respondent: Joint Authority Established Pursuant to the Treaty of 11 December 1989 between Australia and Indonesia; Third Respondent: Phillips Petroleum (91-12) Pty Limited; Fourth Respondent: Phillips Petroleum Company ZOC; Fifth Respondent: Phillips Petroleum Timor Sea Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Motion to Set Aside Notice to Produce
- Outcome
- Application to set aside notice to produce not granted; call on production deferred until further order. Orders made as to procedural management.
- Legal Topics
- Notice to Produce, Abuse of Process, Discovery, Justiciability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petrotimor Companhia de Petroleos S.A.R.L.
First Applicant
Oceanic Exploration Company
Second Applicant
Commonwealth of Australia
First Respondent
Joint Authority Established Pursuant to the Treaty of 11 December 1989 between Australia and Indonesia
Second Respondent
Phillips Petroleum (91-12) Pty Limited
Third Respondent
Phillips Petroleum Company ZOC
Fourth Respondent
Phillips Petroleum Timor Sea Pty Limited
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Motion to Set Aside Notice to Produce
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notice to produce served by Phillips on Petrotimor serves a legitimate forensic purpose, particularly at the interlocutory stage where a strike out application is pending.
Ratio Decidendi
Production of documents under the notice to produce is deferred, as requiring immediate compliance would not serve a legitimate forensic purpose at this interlocutory stage, where the strike out application is pending and the necessity for production has not been demonstrated. The court reserves liberty to apply or restore the notice if circumstances change.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside notice to produce not granted; call on production deferred until further order. Orders made as to procedural management.
Orders
- Until further order, applicants are not required to produce documents called for in the third to fifth respondents' notice to produce dated 21 November 2001.
- The notice of motion filed by the applicants dated 13 December 2001 is stood over generally with liberty to restore on three days' notice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment