WENTWORTH v DE MONTFORT (on application to set aside pars 7 and 9 of notice to produce) [1989] NSWCA 226
The grounds to support the notice to produce financial records and audit trails were not laid, and the application to adduce fresh evidence did not warrant such documentation. Thus, paragraphs 7 and 9 of the notice to produce were set aside.
- Parties
- Claimant: Wentworth; Opponent: De Montfort
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Notice to Produce / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Application granted; paragraphs 7 and 9 of the notice to produce set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Notice to Produce, Fresh Evidence, Subpoena Duces Tecum
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wentworth
Claimant
De Montfort
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Notice to Produce / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether paragraphs 7 and 9 of the notice to produce are proper for the purposes of an application to adduce fresh evidence.
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds to support the notice to produce financial records and audit trails were not laid, and the application to adduce fresh evidence did not warrant such documentation. Thus, paragraphs 7 and 9 of the notice to produce were set aside.
Court Disposition
Application granted; paragraphs 7 and 9 of the notice to produce set aside.
Orders
- Paragraph 7 of the notice to produce set aside.
- Paragraph 9 of the notice to produce set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment