Hassoun v R [2023] NSWCCA 5
The applicant's offending was as part of a coordinated syndicate and the sentencing judge considered both the objective gravity and subjective circumstances of all co-offenders; the limited differentiation in sentence did not give rise to a justifiable sense of grievance or miscarry the sentencing discretion. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Nouril Hassoun; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed (leave to appeal granted)
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sentence, Parity, Drug Offences, Supply of Prohibited Drug, Sentencing Discretion
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nouril Hassoun
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant gave rise to a justifiable sense of grievance compared to co-offenders
- 2 Whether sentencing discretion miscarried due to lack of differentiation in objective and subjective features among co-offenders
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's offending was as part of a coordinated syndicate and the sentencing judge considered both the objective gravity and subjective circumstances of all co-offenders; the limited differentiation in sentence did not give rise to a justifiable sense of grievance or miscarry the sentencing discretion. The applicant's role and criminality were properly considered relative to those of his co-offenders.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed (leave to appeal granted)
Orders
- Grant leave to appeal.
- Dismiss the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment