NRMA V Carroll [1999] NSWSC 1022

NRMA V Carroll [1999] NSWSC 1022

None of the reasons advanced by the plaintiff—preparation time, increased costs, lack of urgency, or possible member confusion—were sufficient to justify the extension of time sought for calling and holding the general meeting. The statutory timetable must be adhered to absent compelling justification.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 October 1999
Procedural Posture
Summons / Judgment
Outcome
Summons dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time for Meeting of Members' 'section 1322 of the Corporations Law' 'section 249 D of the Corporations Law' 'costs of Convening Meetings' 'requisition of General Meeting']
['corporations'] ['extension of Time for Meeting of Members' 'section 1322 of the Corporations Law' 'section 249 D of the Corporations Law' 'costs of Convening Meetings' 'requisition of General Meeting']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Summons / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the period for calling and holding a general meeting as required by s 249D of the Corporations Law and the Articles should be extended pursuant to s 1322 of the Corporations Law.']

Ratio Decidendi

None of the reasons advanced by the plaintiff—preparation time, increased costs, lack of urgency, or possible member confusion—were sufficient to justify the extension of time sought for calling and holding the general meeting. The statutory timetable must be adhered to absent compelling justification.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed

Orders

  • ['The summons be dismissed' 'No order as to costs']