R v Qaumi & Ors (No 19) [2016] NSWSC 352
Given the sensitive nature of the evidence from the Crime Commission and the requirements of the Court Suppression Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), a non-publication order is necessary to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice, to protect the safety of witnesses, and because the public interest in non-publication outweighs the public interest in open justice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory (application for Non Publication Order)
- Outcome
- Non-publication orders made
- Legal Topics
- ['non Publication Order' 'evidence' 'crime Commission' 'suppression Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory (application for Non Publication Order)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to make a non-publication order in relation to evidence given before the NSW Crime Commission and disclosed in criminal proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the sensitive nature of the evidence from the Crime Commission and the requirements of the Court Suppression Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), a non-publication order is necessary to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice, to protect the safety of witnesses, and because the public interest in non-publication outweighs the public interest in open justice.
Court Disposition
Non-publication orders made
Orders
- ['Pending further order, disclosure of the specified evidence or information derived therefrom is prohibited save for the proper purposes of these proceedings.' 'Orders made under s 8(1)(a), (c) and (e) of the Court Suppression Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW).' 'Order applies throughout the Commonwealth...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment