NSW Crime Commission v Christopher Mihelic [2015] NSWSC 166
There were reasonable grounds supporting the suspicion that Christopher Mihelic was engaged in serious crime related activities, thus justifying the making of restraining orders ex parte as provided by s.10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 to preserve property pending further proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Summons / Interlocutory (ex Parte) Application for Restraining Order
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['confiscation of Proceeds of Crime' 'restraining Order' 'reasonable Suspicion' 'ex Parte Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by Summons / Interlocutory (ex Parte) Application for Restraining Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there are reasonable grounds for suspicion to justify a restraining order under s.10A Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990' 'Whether the application may be determined ex parte' 'Whether notice to the defendant can be dispensed with in the circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
There were reasonable grounds supporting the suspicion that Christopher Mihelic was engaged in serious crime related activities, thus justifying the making of restraining orders ex parte as provided by s.10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 to preserve property pending further proceedings.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['No person (other than a registered mortgagee) is to deal with specified interests in property of Christopher Mihelic as listed in Schedules One and Two, pursuant to s.10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990.' 'Christopher Mihelic to be examined on oath before the Registrar concerning his property interests.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment