New South Wales Crime Commission v Flower [2019] NSWSC 742

New South Wales Crime Commission v Flower [2019] NSWSC 742

Because the proposed adjustment to the restraining order was sought by the Crime Commission with the defendant's consent, the Court made orders in accordance with the signed and sealed Consent Orders.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 June 2019
Procedural Posture
Variation of Restraining Orders / Consent Orders
Outcome
Consent orders made.
Legal Topics
['variation of Restraining Orders' 'criminal Assets Recovery']
['criminal Law'] ['variation of Restraining Orders' 'criminal Assets Recovery']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Variation of Restraining Orders / Consent Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether further consent orders should be made to adjust the restraining orders made on 23 May 2019 to allow certain business interests to continue while leaving other aspects of the restraining orders in place.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the proposed adjustment to the restraining order was sought by the Crime Commission with the defendant's consent, the Court made orders in accordance with the signed and sealed Consent Orders.

Court Disposition

Consent orders made.

Orders

  • ['Orders made in accordance with the Consent Orders signed and sealed.' 'The restraining order was varied to allow the defendant, or any other person on his behalf, to deal with the interest in the property of the defendant in any horse for the purpose of sale in accordance with orders 4 and 5 of the Consent...