Challita v NSW Department of Education & Training [2011] NSWADT 16
Disclosure of school names in Marks Reports would not be unreasonable given removal of alphabetical rankings, applicants’ statements, and intent not to publish; copy to include school names may be released.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Jolanda Challita; Second Applicant: Peter Challita; Respondent: NSW Department of Education & Training
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Review of Agency FOI Determination / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Decision to exclude school names set aside; school names to be included in Marks Reports released to Applicants; decision otherwise affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Exempt Documents, Documents Affecting Personal Affairs, School Assessment Data
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jolanda Challita
First Applicant
Peter Challita
Second Applicant
NSW Department of Education & Training
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Review of Agency FOI Determination / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether disclosure of school names in Marks Reports involves unreasonable disclosure of personal information under clause 6(1) of Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 1989
Ratio Decidendi
Disclosure of school names in Marks Reports would not be unreasonable given removal of alphabetical rankings, applicants’ statements, and intent not to publish; copy to include school names may be released.
Court Disposition
Decision to exclude school names set aside; school names to be included in Marks Reports released to Applicants; decision otherwise affirmed.
Orders
- The decision to exclude the school names from the Marks Reports released to the Applicants is set aside.
- The decision is made that the school names are to be included in the Marks Reports released to the Applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment