Fairbairn v RadeckiCitation:[2022] HCA 18Before:Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Keane, Gordon, Edelman, Steward, Gleeson JJDate:11 May 2022Case Number:S179/2021Read more
The Court held that the de facto relationship had broken down within the meaning of s 90SM because the appellant's permanent move to an aged care facility and the cessation of cohabitation indicated the end of living together on a genuine domestic basis and mutual commitment to a shared life.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: NSW Trustee and Guardian; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law De Facto Financial Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for property settlement orders granted
- Legal Topics
- De Facto Relationship, Alteration of Property Interests, Property Settlement, Breakdown of Relationship
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NSW Trustee and Guardian
Applicant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law De Facto Financial Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the de facto relationship between the appellant and respondent had broken down within the meaning of s 90SM of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the de facto relationship had broken down within the meaning of s 90SM because the appellant's permanent move to an aged care facility and the cessation of cohabitation indicated the end of living together on a genuine domestic basis and mutual commitment to a shared life.
Court Disposition
Application for property settlement orders granted
Orders
- The appellant's home to be sold to fund aged care facility costs
- Property settlement orders made pursuant to s 90SM of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment