Nuova Surry Hills v Sydney City Council [2004] NSWLEC 335

The appeal was dismissed because the overall level of amenity of the proposed development was found to be unacceptable based on written and oral evidence, site view, and submissions.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 08 June 2004
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome: appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: ['development Application' 'amenity Assessment']

['planning and Environment'] ['development Application' 'amenity Assessment']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the overall level of amenity of the proposed development is acceptable']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the overall level of amenity of the proposed development was found to be unacceptable based on written and oral evidence, site view, and submissions.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

['Appeal is dismissed' 'Development application determined by refusal of development consent' 'Exhibits may be returned to the parties']

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.