Oberon Shire Council v Kiangatha Holdings Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 30
The proceedings were not compromised or settled within the meaning of s 73 Civil Procedure Act as not all issues (particularly costs) were agreed. The Council's application to amend was causally linked to the Company's undertaking to the Court to complete remediation works by a specified date, amounting to capitulation by the Company. Costs should follow the event, and a gross sum costs order is appropriate given the circumstances.
- Parties
- Applicant: Oberon Shire Council; Respondent: Kiangatha Holdings Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Civil Enforcement Proceedings / Discontinuance After Interlocutory Applications and Orders as to Costs
- Outcome
- Company's Notice of Motion dismissed; Council granted leave to amend; undertaking by Company noted; proceedings discontinued; Respondent ordered to pay Applicant's costs in gross sum.
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Remediation Orders, Settlement of Proceedings, Costs Following Discontinuance, Undertakings to Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oberon Shire Council
Applicant
Kiangatha Holdings Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Civil Enforcement Proceedings / Discontinuance After Interlocutory Applications and Orders as to Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceedings were compromised or settled to enable s 73 Civil Procedure Act 2005 to be used
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to amend Summons and Points of Claim
- 3 Whether costs should follow the event or other order given the discontinuance
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were not compromised or settled within the meaning of s 73 Civil Procedure Act as not all issues (particularly costs) were agreed. The Council's application to amend was causally linked to the Company's undertaking to the Court to complete remediation works by a specified date, amounting to capitulation by the Company. Costs should follow the event, and a gross sum costs order is appropriate given the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Company's Notice of Motion dismissed; Council granted leave to amend; undertaking by Company noted; proceedings discontinued; Respondent ordered to pay Applicant's costs in gross sum.
Orders
- Respondent's Notice of Motion of 30 November 2020 is dismissed.
- Applicant is granted leave to rely on the Amended Summons and Amended Points of Claim annexed to the Applicant's Notice of Motion filed on 3 September 2020.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment