OC Investments Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1250
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the agreement by upholding the appeal and approving the development application subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'multi Dwelling Housing' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'land and Environment Court Class 1 Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the agreement by upholding the appeal and approving the development application subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans referred to in condition 1 of Annexure "A".' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. 17/0383 for demolition of existing buildings, construction of a multi dwelling housing development with two, two-storey dwellings and a rear villa with attic...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment