Ocean Energy Construction Pty Ltd v Oceanlinx Limited (in liq) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2016] FCA 1055

Ocean Energy Construction Pty Ltd v Oceanlinx Limited (in liq) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2016] FCA 1055

Where a plaintiff company is impecunious, and the beneficiaries of the litigation are third-party creditors, security for costs should be ordered unless evidence shows that the creditors are unable or unwilling to provide security, and absent such evidence, stultification is not established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 August 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs
Outcome
Security for costs ordered; proceedings stayed until security provided; costs of interlocutory applications awarded to defendants; matter adjourned for directions.
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'impecunious Plaintiff' 'stultification of Proceedings']
['practice and Procedure' 'corporations Law' 'corporate Insolvency'] ['security for Costs' 'impecunious Plaintiff' 'stultification of Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an order for security for costs should be made against an admittedly impecunious plaintiff where third-party creditors would benefit from the proceedings' 'Whether such an order would stultify the proceedings']

Ratio Decidendi

Where a plaintiff company is impecunious, and the beneficiaries of the litigation are third-party creditors, security for costs should be ordered unless evidence shows that the creditors are unable or unwilling to provide security, and absent such evidence, stultification is not established.

Court Disposition

Security for costs ordered; proceedings stayed until security provided; costs of interlocutory applications awarded to defendants; matter adjourned for directions.

Orders

  • ["The Plaintiff provide security of $60,000 for the First, Second and Third Respondents' costs within 28 days." "The Plaintiff provide security of $37,500 for the Fourth and Fifth Respondents' costs within 28 days." "The Plaintiff provide further security of $60,000 for the First, Second and Third Respondents' costs...