Ocean Shores Community Association Inc v Byron Shire Council (No 4) [2015] NSWLEC 175
There are no substantial prospects of success on appeal, any delay was not caused by the applicant, but continuation of the injunction would cause loss to the Council and purchasers; the balance of convenience favours allowing the Council to benefit from its success. Discretion to continue the injunction is not exercised.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ocean Shores Community Association Inc; First Respondent: Byron Shire Council; Second Respondent: Minister for Planning
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 / Application for Continuation of Injunction Post Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for continuation of injunction dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Discretion, Land Classification, Sale of Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ocean Shores Community Association Inc
Applicant
Byron Shire Council
First Respondent
Minister for Planning
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 4 / Application for Continuation of Injunction Post Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to exercise discretion to continue an injunction restraining sale of land after final judgment dismissing applicant's proceedings
- 2 Balance of convenience and loss in considering continuation of injunction
Ratio Decidendi
There are no substantial prospects of success on appeal, any delay was not caused by the applicant, but continuation of the injunction would cause loss to the Council and purchasers; the balance of convenience favours allowing the Council to benefit from its success. Discretion to continue the injunction is not exercised.
Court Disposition
Application for continuation of injunction dismissed
Orders
- The application to continue the injunction restraining the sale of the land is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment