R v Symiziris [2001] NSWCCA 38

R v Symiziris [2001] NSWCCA 38

The sentencing judge misunderstood the pre-sentence report and incorrectly imposed a fixed term for rehabilitation reasons when the applicant was entitled to a minimum and additional term due to his circumstances; the fixed term was not warranted for this offence or applicant's background.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Odyssais Symiziris
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 February 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Sentence quashed. Applicant sentenced to two years imprisonment from 12 October 1999 with a non-parole period expiring on 16 February 2001; applicant entitled to immediate release.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Robbery

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Odyssais Symiziris

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in imposing a fixed term of imprisonment rather than a minimum term and an additional term under s 6(2) of the Sentencing Act 1980.
  2. 2 Appropriateness of fixed term sentencing where rehabilitation and recidivism are in issue.

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge misunderstood the pre-sentence report and incorrectly imposed a fixed term for rehabilitation reasons when the applicant was entitled to a minimum and additional term due to his circumstances; the fixed term was not warranted for this offence or applicant's background.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Sentence quashed. Applicant sentenced to two years imprisonment from 12 October 1999 with a non-parole period expiring on 16 February 2001; applicant entitled to immediate release.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted.
  • Appeal against sentence allowed.