R v E [2005] NSWDRGC 1
The elements of an offence under s 11E of the Summary Offences Act 1988 do not necessarily provide the complete answer to whether the charge is an offence involving violent conduct under s 5 of the Drug Court Act 1998, because the offence can be established without actual fear or a person of reasonable firmness being present. It was therefore necessary to consider Mr E's particular conduct. His use of knives to damage motor vehicles, possession of a large butcher knife and another knife when confronted by police, refusal to drop the knives after police demands, and the need for capsicum spray constituted violent conduct. He was charged with an offence involving violent conduct and was not...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Drug Court Eligibility Determination / Referral to the Drug Court on Charges and Call Up for Sentence on Breach of Bond
- Outcome
- Mr E was found not to be an eligible person for a Drug Court program.
- Legal Topics
- ['offence Involving Violent Conduct' 'wielding a Knife in a Public Place' 'drug Court Program Eligibility']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Drug Court Eligibility Determination / Referral to the Drug Court on Charges and Call Up for Sentence on Breach of Bond
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mr E was an eligible person under s 5 of the Drug Court Act 1998 given a charge of wielding a knife in a public place under s 11E(1)(a) of the Summary Offences Act 1988.' 'Whether the offence involved violent conduct for the purposes of s 5(2)(b) of the Drug Court Act 1998.' 'Whether the Court should determine violent conduct by the elements of the offence alone or by considering the particular conduct of the offender.']
Ratio Decidendi
The elements of an offence under s 11E of the Summary Offences Act 1988 do not necessarily provide the complete answer to whether the charge is an offence involving violent conduct under s 5 of the Drug Court Act 1998, because the offence can be established without actual fear or a person of reasonable firmness being present. It was therefore necessary to consider Mr E's particular conduct. His use of knives to damage motor vehicles, possession of a large butcher knife and another knife when confronted by police, refusal to drop the knives after police demands, and the need for capsicum spray constituted violent conduct. He was charged with an offence involving violent conduct and was not...
Court Disposition
Mr E was found not to be an eligible person for a Drug Court program.
Orders
- ['The matters must be returned to the Local Court.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment