Haines, Re M.F. Ex Parte Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1986] FCA 305
There was no error in the Deputy Registrar's discretion to refuse adjournment of the section 69 examination. The standing order means the bankruptcy continues, and notice of appeal produces no stay. The circumstances did not require the adjournment be granted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Official Trustee in Bankruptcy; Bankrupt: Michael Frederick Haines
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Review Decision of Deputy Registrar / Judgment on Review of Adjournment Decision
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Section 69 Examination, Adjournment of Examination, Discharge of Bankrupt Under S.149
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
Applicant
Michael Frederick Haines
Bankrupt
Procedural Posture
Application to Review Decision of Deputy Registrar / Judgment on Review of Adjournment Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deputy Registrar erred in refusing to adjourn a section 69 examination pending appeal against an order affecting the discharge date of the bankrupt
- 2 Whether a discharged bankrupt is still subject to an examination order under section 69 of the Bankruptcy Act
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error in the Deputy Registrar's discretion to refuse adjournment of the section 69 examination. The standing order means the bankruptcy continues, and notice of appeal produces no stay. The circumstances did not require the adjournment be granted.
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed
Orders
- The decision of the Deputy Registrar refusing to adjourn the section 69 examination is affirmed. The examination is to continue before the Deputy Registrar.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment