Re Collins, S.I. v. Ex Parte Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1986] FCA 111
A notice given by the bankrupt plaintiff does not constitute a notice by a 'defendant or other party' under s.60(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, as that provision is directed towards parties in the position of the defendant, not the bankrupt plaintiff. Thus, the trustee was not required to elect within 28 days of such a notice.
- Parties
- Applicant: Official Trustee in Bankruptcy; Bankrupt / Plaintiff: Sheila Irene Collins; Respondent / Defendant: Jay Morris Bracher
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Application for Declaratory Relief and Costs at First Instance
- Outcome
- Declaration granted; costs awarded to applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee's Election in Litigation, Notice Under S.60 Bankruptcy Act, Interpretation of Procedural Provisions, Time Extension for Election
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
Applicant
Sheila Irene Collins
Bankrupt / Plaintiff
Jay Morris Bracher
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Application for Declaratory Relief and Costs at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a notice from the bankrupt plaintiff constitute notice from an 'other party' under s.60(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966?
- 2 Should time for election under s.60(3) be extended?
Ratio Decidendi
A notice given by the bankrupt plaintiff does not constitute a notice by a 'defendant or other party' under s.60(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, as that provision is directed towards parties in the position of the defendant, not the bankrupt plaintiff. Thus, the trustee was not required to elect within 28 days of such a notice.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted; costs awarded to applicant.
Orders
- Declaration that the letter dated 22 September 1980 did not constitute a notice for the purpose of s.60(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
- The respondent pay the applicant's costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment