Re Corke, Jane Vida Ex Parte Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1996] FCA 156
Given Sharp was the only creditor to provide indemnities for costs, assumed substantial risk, and its indemnity was crucial to asset preservation, it is appropriate to give Sharp 100% priority for payment of its proved debt.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Distribution of Proceeds/priority Determination
- Outcome
- Application granted; Sharp given 100% priority for its proved debt, remainder distributed pro-rata among other creditors.
- Legal Topics
- ['priority Payments' 'indemnity by Creditor' 'distribution of Proceeds']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Distribution of Proceeds/priority Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnifying creditor (Sharp) is entitled to priority in distribution under s.109(10) of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
Given Sharp was the only creditor to provide indemnities for costs, assumed substantial risk, and its indemnity was crucial to asset preservation, it is appropriate to give Sharp 100% priority for payment of its proved debt.
Court Disposition
Application granted; Sharp given 100% priority for its proved debt, remainder distributed pro-rata among other creditors.
Orders
- ["Balance held by Official Receiver after payment of costs, remuneration, and fees to be applied first to a dividend of 100 cents in the dollar for Sharp's proved debt ($18,533.50 or as funds permit)." 'Remainder, if any, to be distributed pro-rata among other creditors.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment