Offshore Marine Services Alliance Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 333
Liability to contribute in general average under s 72(3) Marine Insurance Act 1909 (Cth), and at common law, attaches to persons who are owners of the relevant property at the time of sacrifice or extraordinary expenditure, or those contractually bound to contribute to general average. Mere assumption of contractual risk, responsibility for care, custody or preservation of cargo, without ownership or direct contract, does not attract liability for general average contribution.
- Parties
- Applicant: Offshore Marine Services Alliance Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd; Fourth Respondent: Thiess Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty General Division / Preliminary Question Determination Judgment
- Outcome
- Preliminary question answered. Applicant's claim for general average contribution rejected. Costs awarded to respondents.
- Legal Topics
- General Average, Marine Insurance, Contractual Risk Allocation, Liability to Contribute in General Average
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Offshore Marine Services Alliance Pty Ltd
Applicant
Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd
Third Respondent
Thiess Pty Ltd
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Admiralty General Division / Preliminary Question Determination Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether liability to contribute in general average under s 72(3) Marine Insurance Act 1909 (Cth) attaches to parties responsible for care, custody, control, safekeeping and preservation of cargo (but not owners)
- 2 Whether contractual assumption of risk produces liability for general average contribution at common law or statute
Ratio Decidendi
Liability to contribute in general average under s 72(3) Marine Insurance Act 1909 (Cth), and at common law, attaches to persons who are owners of the relevant property at the time of sacrifice or extraordinary expenditure, or those contractually bound to contribute to general average. Mere assumption of contractual risk, responsibility for care, custody or preservation of cargo, without ownership or direct contract, does not attract liability for general average contribution.
Court Disposition
Preliminary question answered. Applicant's claim for general average contribution rejected. Costs awarded to respondents.
Orders
- Answer to preliminary question 'A' is No.
- Preliminary question 'B' does not arise.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment