Oil Basins Limited v Bass Strait Oil Company (No 2) [2012] FCA 1197

Oil Basins Limited v Bass Strait Oil Company (No 2) [2012] FCA 1197

BAS should pay OBL's costs of and incidental to the proceeding because OBL succeeded on its primary claim that BAS placed the Somerton Securities in breach of ASX Listing Rule 7.1 and its Constitution and obtained appropriate relief. Although OBL failed on other substantive claims and in defending the cross-claim,...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Costs Determination Following Substantive Reasons for Judgment / Determined on the Papers After the Parties Were Unable to Agree Orders as to Costs
Outcome
The First Defendant was ordered to pay the Plaintiff's costs and the Second Defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceeding.
Legal Topics
['costs Discretion' 'costs Follow the Event' 'apportionment of Costs' 'asx Listing Rules']
['civil Procedure' 'costs'] ['costs Discretion' 'costs Follow the Event' 'apportionment of Costs' 'asx Listing Rules']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Costs Determination Following Substantive Reasons for Judgment / Determined on the Papers After the Parties Were Unable to Agree Orders as to Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the First Defendant or the Plaintiff should pay the costs of the proceeding.' 'Whether costs should be apportioned because the Plaintiff succeeded on its primary claim but failed on other claims and on the cross-claim.' "Whether the Second Defendant's costs should be paid, and by whom." 'Whether the costs order should include the costs of the interlocutory application heard on 16 August 2012.']

Ratio Decidendi

BAS should pay OBL's costs of and incidental to the proceeding because OBL succeeded on its primary claim that BAS placed the Somerton Securities in breach of ASX Listing Rule 7.1 and its Constitution and obtained appropriate relief. Although OBL failed on other substantive claims and in defending the cross-claim, the additional cost, time and complexity of those issues were not large, the hearing took one day, relevant evidence overlapped with the primary claim, and apportionment of costs by issue was not justified. BAS should also pay the costs of the interlocutory application heard on 16 August 2012 because the application would have been unnecessary if BAS had promptly informed OBL...

Court Disposition

The First Defendant was ordered to pay the Plaintiff's costs and the Second Defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceeding.

Orders

  • ['The First Defendant pay the costs of the Plaintiff, and the costs of the Second Defendant, of and incidental to the proceeding, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement.']