Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1952

Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1952

The applicant had no prospects of success on appeal as the grounds related to matters already considered and did not raise substantive new issues.

Parties
Applicant: Olga Dranichnikov; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Ms Ryneete Gault; Third Respondent: Mr Kevin Duffy
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 December 2000
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Motion for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Procedural Compliance, Alleged Bias
Administrative Law Immigration Law Leave to Appeal Procedural Compliance Alleged Bias

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Olga Dranichnikov

Applicant

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

First Respondent

Ms Ryneete Gault

Second Respondent

Mr Kevin Duffy

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Motion for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted regarding dismissal of the applicant's motion for judgment or adjournment based on alleged non-compliance with directions and alleged bias.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant had no prospects of success on appeal as the grounds related to matters already considered and did not raise substantive new issues.

Court Disposition

leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is refused.