Valaire v NSW Education Standards Authority [2019] NSWCATAD 16
The application disclosed no decision by either respondent capable of review by the Tribunal. The Children (Education and Care Services) National Law and the Children (Education and Care Services National Law Application) Act 2010 did not relate to the matters complained of, NESA's 8 March 2018 letter merely explained eligibility criteria and stated that NESA was not involved in scaling or ATAR ranks, and the Department of Education's 27 April 2018 letter contained no reviewable decision about course eligibility or ATAR. The Tribunal therefore lacked jurisdiction and the application had to be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review Application / On the Papers; Respondents Sought Dismissal for Lack of a Reviewable Decision
- Outcome
- The application is dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['tribunal Jurisdiction' 'administratively Reviewable Decision' 'hsc Russian Continuers Course' 'atar Scaling' 'eligibility Criteria']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review Application / On the Papers; Respondents Sought Dismissal for Lack of a Reviewable Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant identified a decision capable of review by the Tribunal under the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997.' 'Whether the decisions identified by the applicant were made under legislation conferring administrative review jurisdiction on the Tribunal.' "Whether the Children (Education and Care Services) National Law or the Children (Education and Care Services National Law Application) Act 2010 applied to the applicant's complaints about the HSC Russian Continuers course and ATAR scaling."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application disclosed no decision by either respondent capable of review by the Tribunal. The Children (Education and Care Services) National Law and the Children (Education and Care Services National Law Application) Act 2010 did not relate to the matters complained of, NESA's 8 March 2018 letter merely explained eligibility criteria and stated that NESA was not involved in scaling or ATAR ranks, and the Department of Education's 27 April 2018 letter contained no reviewable decision about course eligibility or ATAR. The Tribunal therefore lacked jurisdiction and the application had to be dismissed.
Court Disposition
The application is dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment