Primes v Liverpool City Council [2020] NSWLEC 1373
Because the parties had reached agreement on a modified development control order, and the Council was satisfied that the secondary dwelling could be used in the interim and was capable of being granted a Building Information Certificate, it was lawful and appropriate under s 8.18(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to modify the development control order in the agreed terms.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against a Development Control Order / Orders by Consent After Conciliation Was Terminated
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development control order modified.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Control Order' 'secondary Dwelling' 'planning Approval Contravention' 'building Information Certificate' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against a Development Control Order / Orders by Consent After Conciliation Was Terminated
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the development control order issued by Liverpool City Council on 3 June 2019 should be modified under s 8.18(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Whether the unauthorised secondary dwelling had been erected or used in contravention of the planning approval and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties had reached agreement on a modified development control order, and the Council was satisfied that the secondary dwelling could be used in the interim and was capable of being granted a Building Information Certificate, it was lawful and appropriate under s 8.18(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to modify the development control order in the agreed terms.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development control order modified.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The development control order issued by the Respondent to the Applicant on 3 June 2019 is modified in accordance with the development control order at Annexure A.' 'The exhibits are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment