Steele v Parramatta City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1210

Steele v Parramatta City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1210

An agreement reached at a conciliation conference under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, which the Court is satisfied could be made in the proper exercise of its functions, requires the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision.

Parties
Applicant: Oliver Steele; Respondent: Parramatta City Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal (class 1) / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
Outcome
Agreement between parties under s 34(3), proceedings disposed of accordingly
Legal Topics
Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Agreement Between Parties, Court Orders
Planning and Environmental Law Development Application Conciliation Conference Agreement Between Parties Court Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Oliver Steele

Applicant

Parramatta City Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Development Application Appeal (class 1) / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conciliated agreement is one the Court could make under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979

Ratio Decidendi

An agreement reached at a conciliation conference under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, which the Court is satisfied could be made in the proper exercise of its functions, requires the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision.

Court Disposition

Agreement between parties under s 34(3), proceedings disposed of accordingly

Orders

  • Final orders made to effect parties' agreement; details accessible via court link