Sabouni v Revelop Building and Developments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 31
Neither party established their claim for contractual damages. Mr Sabouni was not entitled to the second progress payment as the claim did not comply with the contract's timing and included uncompleted works. RBD failed to prove its damages claim as there was insufficient evidence to link costs incurred to breach or repudiation by Mr Sabouni and to identify quantum recoverable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim and Defendant's Cross-Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['construction Contract' 'progress Claims' 'termination' 'damages' 'repudiation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Plaintiff was entitled to the amount of the second progress claim made prior to Defendant's termination of contract" 'Whether Defendant was entitled to recover additional costs of construction works incurred after termination of construction contract with Plaintiff']
Ratio Decidendi
Neither party established their claim for contractual damages. Mr Sabouni was not entitled to the second progress payment as the claim did not comply with the contract's timing and included uncompleted works. RBD failed to prove its damages claim as there was insufficient evidence to link costs incurred to breach or repudiation by Mr Sabouni and to identify quantum recoverable.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim and Defendant's Cross-Claim dismissed
Orders
- ["Plaintiff's claim dismissed" "Defendant's Cross-claim dismissed" 'Parties to file agreed short minutes or draft orders and submissions as to costs within 14 days']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment